Mistake 1

Incorrect relevance ratings for distance.
a) Missing real world results that Try Rating does not return.
b) Demoting the closest address because it is not a real world address.
c) Demoting a real world address when there is a closer nonexistent address returned on Try rating.

Solution:
Review section 8.1.1 of the guidelines

Mistake 2:

Incorrect relevance ratings for prominence.

Solution:
Review section 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 of the guidelines: Prominence and Distance vs. Prominence.

The prominence of a feature refers to its popularity, including the number of people visiting and media resources referencing it.

  • Prominence can vary based on the test locale and even local knowledge.
  • Consider the following list to get a general idea of prominence, ordered from high to low.
    o The feature is known internationally
    o The feature is known nationally
    o The feature is known in the region/state
    o The feature is known locally
    o The feature may not even be known locally
  • Suggestions with high prominence may still be relevant even when far away.
  • Suggestions with low prominence may not be as relevant even when close.
  • Once you’ve decided how relevant a result is, consider the suggestion in the context of all possible real world suggestions.
  • Each suggestion is given a rating based on prominence and distance to the location intent.

Trend 1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post