Result relevance is Excellent, not Navigational
To achieve a relevance rating of Navigational a result must be the most likely result implied by the user’s query, location, and/or viewport that completely satisfies the user’s distinct intent. A result that is not unique and not near the user or viewport would be rated at most, Excellent.
Please see Maps Search Guidelines section 1.3.3. Result Relevance Rating and the official government address resource https://danmarksadresser.dk/
viewport Relevance Rating: Excellent
Result relevance is Excellent, not Navigational (example)
Query: Valby
Result:
Valby 2500
Relevance
Transit queries
A transit query result that does not meet Navigational relevancy rating can still partially satisfy user intent. Other results that could partially satisfy the user intent should be demoted further for distance and prominence. In general, the fewer the results that satisfy the user intent, the farther away the results can be and still be considered relevant. The more available results that can satisfy user intent, the closer they need ,
to be.
Please see Maps Search Guidelines section 5.16.1. Transit Queries
Transit queries (example)
A partially correct name differs from official versions but can still be recognised by the user. Partially correct names can include minor and moderate misspellings, service level mismatches and missing and unnecessary name parts.
Remember: If a name is deemed Partially Correct AND the classification is Incorrect then the final Name
Accuracy will always be Incorrect. See: Maps Search Guidelines section 6.2.2. Partially Correct Name
Example: Princesse Slottet
Research shows that there is a business of this name in Randers. The result, Princesse Slotten returns the same address shown on the official business website https://prinsesse-slottet.dk/. Further research
shows that the name has a minor mispelling and should be Princesse Slottet. The classification is correct and the minor mispelling in the name does not prevent the user from identifying the business. Therefore,
the final Name Accuracy rating is Partially Correct. See: Maps Search Guidelines section 6.2.2. Partially Correct Name
A final Name Accuracy rating of Incorrect is given when there is a minor error with a result name (refer to previous £
slide) together with an incorrect classification OR from an incorrect classification alone OR from a result name that is so changed as to be unrecogniseable to the user. See: Maps Search Guidelines section 6.2.3. Incorrect Name
Consider a result name incorrect when:
change in meaning
misspelling that results in an entirely different word or gibberish
unnecessary or missing parts in the name that prevent the user from recognizing the business
slang and inappropriate language
using the previous name of the same entity that is not a variation of the current name and therefore cannot be identified
Consider a classification incorrect when it is:
wrong
misspelled
in an unexpected language/script
misleading
incomplete (missing parts or has uncommon/odd abbreviations
See: Maps Search Guidelines section 6.3.2. Incorrect Classification and 6.7. Final Name Accuracy Rating
.
Address is missing sub-locality
If the query is for an address that according to official sources contains a sub-locality, then the result must return the sub-locality as part of the address to be considered Correct. This is regardless of whether the sub-locality is included in the query or not.
Please see Country Specific Guidelines section 2.3. Sub-localities in Denmark
and the official government’s official address resource https://danmarksadresser.dk/
Address is missing sub-locality (example)
Address
Incorrect postal code
If the query is for a business or POI the address in the result must return the correct postal code to be considered Correct.
Please see Maps Search Guildelines section 7.1.6. Postal Code
and the official government address resource https://danmarksadresser.dk/
Address
Incorrect postal code (Example)
Example: Silvan Vanløse
Research shows that the branch of Silvan in Vanløse has the address Slotsherrensvej 123, 2720 Vanløse.
The result data returns the correct postal code as part of the address, and according to Maps Search
Guildelines section 7.1.6. Postal Code should be rated Correct. https://www.silvan.dk/butikker/vanloese
Approximate rating on single rooftop
Where a result is located in a one building with single street number and with other businesses also located under the rooftop, a pin on a part of the rooftop not over the result will achieve a Pin Accuracy rating of Approximate. See: Map Search Guidelines section 9.2.Single Rooftop [One building with single street number and multiple businesses under the rooftop] Example Type) .
This rating can only be given when the location of the result within the building can be confirmed
through research.
Approximate rating on single rooftop (example)
Approximate rating on single rooftop (example) continued
It could be assumed that the pin is perfect as it lands on the street number in the address. However, this MUST be checked if possible, using street imagery for evidence of the location. Examining available street imagery shows several businesses located under this rooftop, including a driving school and a bingo hall. The pin is on the rooftop of the driving school, not the result charity shop. With this evidence the Pin Accuracy rating is Approximate. See: Map Search Guidelines section 9.2.Single Rooftop [One building with single street number and multiple businesses under the rooftop] Example Type) .
When a pin drops on the immediate property next door to the intended one it should receive a Pin Accuracy rating of Next Door.
A Next Door pin must be:
See: Map Search Guidelines section 9.1.4. Next Door. It is important to conduct research to establish
the ground truth. The official government address resource https://danmarksadresser.dk/ and available . \
street imagery should be consulted.
Pin on next door (example)
one and which meets all the criteria for the Pin Guidelines section 9.1.4. Next Door.
